Please tell me if this poster seems familiar
- Thread starter Curse
- Start date
Tiveria
Sheeptastic!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Stavrose @ Feb 28 2007, 07:07 PM) [snapback]146199[/snapback][/center]
lol The last couple I've sent to V have gotten stickied...not always tho'
Oh, and since I don't have the pretty "SWG Stratics" Tag atm due to their forum bugs, my nick doesn't stand out atm. But who knows - they could remember me
lol The last couple I've sent to V have gotten stickied...not always tho'
Oh, and since I don't have the pretty "SWG Stratics" Tag atm due to their forum bugs, my nick doesn't stand out atm. But who knows - they could remember me
Fluffy
Vote Stewart/Colbert in '08!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Tavasha @ Feb 28 2007, 09:24 PM) [snapback]146234[/snapback][/center]
There are plenty of people that I debate with there that are excellent people to debate with, regardless of how much I agree/disagree with them.
Shall I list them?
There are plenty of people that I debate with there that are excellent people to debate with, regardless of how much I agree/disagree with them.
Shall I list them?
I really didn't pay attention to any of the arguments. it just became obvious that there was abuse of the report system going on, and that every little thing became a big deal. It made me babysit, and i don't like babysitting. So I decided to play like a baby with the babies. I took actions on both sides. Both syntax and ekibe were banned from the coffee house since neither could act like responsible individuals. Both overreacted when this happened. One has not returned, the other tried an unsuccessful coup to make people leave this forum and join another.
Frankly, I'm glad its over and I don't have to get 11 damn reports from the same person about "subliminal" or "subtle" "hints" that "vaguely" resemble a personal insult if read in one of the 10000 different ways it could be read. What pissed me off more was the whole "justification" of each persons reports cause all of a sudden they gave a shit about the "coffee house" rules cause they were too bitch to concede to an argument or come up with a more cohesive counterargument.
/rant off
Antonella Barba. mmmmmmmmmmm
Frankly, I'm glad its over and I don't have to get 11 damn reports from the same person about "subliminal" or "subtle" "hints" that "vaguely" resemble a personal insult if read in one of the 10000 different ways it could be read. What pissed me off more was the whole "justification" of each persons reports cause all of a sudden they gave a shit about the "coffee house" rules cause they were too bitch to concede to an argument or come up with a more cohesive counterargument.
/rant off
Antonella Barba. mmmmmmmmmmm
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Fluffy @ Feb 28 2007, 08:09 PM) [snapback]146249[/snapback][/center]
There are enough people following steps 1-5 in there to make listing them as if Ekibe was the only person in there acting like that kinda silly, Fluffy. Saying most was unfair on my part, but it's certainly enough to make an impression on the casual reader. Perhaps it's just the same people popping up in all the threads I happen to click on. ^_^
That said, I think starting a flamewar then reporting it is pretty darn silly, especially in the amount that stav mentioned. :wacko:
There are enough people following steps 1-5 in there to make listing them as if Ekibe was the only person in there acting like that kinda silly, Fluffy. Saying most was unfair on my part, but it's certainly enough to make an impression on the casual reader. Perhaps it's just the same people popping up in all the threads I happen to click on. ^_^
That said, I think starting a flamewar then reporting it is pretty darn silly, especially in the amount that stav mentioned. :wacko:
Fluffy
Vote Stewart/Colbert in '08!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Tavasha @ Feb 28 2007, 11:36 PM) [snapback]146253[/snapback][/center]
Ahhhh, casual discourse, and even some hint of consensus. Now that is something we almost never saw from the person in question, and hence the "singling out" of her.
Of course not everyone is perfect, but you are right not everyone is innocent of the above mentioned debate "style". However, what she did I looked at it as baiting people into flamewars, as opposed to starting them, but that is just semantics. The ban from the house del cafe was justly deserved for the continual antics.
Ahhhh, casual discourse, and even some hint of consensus. Now that is something we almost never saw from the person in question, and hence the "singling out" of her.
Of course not everyone is perfect, but you are right not everyone is innocent of the above mentioned debate "style". However, what she did I looked at it as baiting people into flamewars, as opposed to starting them, but that is just semantics. The ban from the house del cafe was justly deserved for the continual antics.
Remember, it wasn't just HER that was banned. She was the SECOND one banned during that time period. There ALMOST was a third one to add to the list, but everything went back to normal once she got the boot from the cafe. So lets not make it seem like I was out to get HER, even though she was the one that pissed me off the most with her actions. I used the most by-the-book approach I could.
She's at it again, get it while its still alive.
"Restuss should be for PVE'ers"
"Restuss should be for PVE'ers"
- followed by 23+ pages of flames.